UNDERTHERADAR.CO.NZ | UTR.CO.NZ
album reviews  | live reviews  | interviews  | bands  | music videos  | photos  | mp3s  | store advertising  | faqs  | help  | contact

The Morning Benders - Big Echo

Big Echo

The Morning Benders

Big Echo

Rough Trade
6 / 10
25/06/2010

By Lukas Clark-Memler

The Morning Benders’ vocalist and founder Christopher Chu said in a recent interview that he would like to “pile 50 people into the studio… and just blow it out”. Welcome to Big Echo - Big ideas, big drums, big vocals and big production. Big is a word that encapsulates quite accurately what The Morning Benders were attempting to create with their latest release.

After a few years in musical limbo the band were taken under the wing of producer Chris Taylor, who due to the astronomical success of Grizzly Bear’s Veckatimest helped turn The Morning Benders career to gold. But there is such a thing as too much production. The songs are too tight, too well rehearsed. There is too much layering and too many effects added to the drums. Whether it is the fault of the producer trying to create the next Veckatimest - or the fault of the band attempting to sacrifice their authenticity for a gold record, Big Echo is ‘too much’ in so many ways.

With that said, a few tracks stand out from the otherwise generic mix. “Excuses” is a timeless and melodically enriching achievement that is a fantastic way to start the album. With an early 60s feel, the track sets the tone for what is to come. From the sharp guitar chords that split open "Hand Me Downs," the multi-layered swooning of "Stitches," and the hymn-like, gentle vocals on ending track "Sleeping In", this vast production fills out Big Echo far more than their rather sparse previous album Talking Through Tin Cans.

With Big Echo we see what happens when you “pile 50 people into the studio”. There is definitely a lot going on, but the raw Wall of Sound is never achieved. All the kinks have been smoothed out to a point of boring perfection. Big Echo’s aim for transcendence is so deliberate and palpable, that it comes off as manufactured sentiment. There is no youthful energy, angst or emotion. There are hardly any hooks or catchy choruses. But I still have faith in The Morning Benders. They’ve shown they are capable of vast changes in style and sound and for their next release I would like to see them strip back and succumb to their instincts – and not a corporate record label.





comments
Total: 11
user image
Too many smart asses in this country.

Posted by Samuel - anonymous 1 year ago

user image
Wow joe. Thank you so much for that contribution. And outstanding use of 'lol' Sorry I find it hard to 'fukn' enjoy when i realise there are people out there who have yet to master the English language. Keep practicing buddy and you will get there, spelling and grammar ARE hard, but practice makes perfect.

Posted by xx - anonymous 1 year ago

user image
lol why are peepz getting so up in arms over music, just listen and fukn enjoy bros, all of yous below need to get over yourselves

Posted by Joe - anonymous 1 year ago

user image
fuckin good article.
Pitchfork IS for fags.
this is quality writing


Posted by CV - anonymous 1 year ago

user image
In my opinion music reviewing is somewhat defunct these days anyway, people should be focusing more on those blogs that dish out music with no comments, opinions or reviews and then make their own minds up. As they say - different strokes for different folks.

Posted by Matthew - anonymous 1 year ago

user image
only fags read pitchfork

Posted by <> - anonymous 1 year ago

user image
Indie music - independent music. Thats literally what it means. What the public conceive it to be dont actually matter. So technically Morning Benders are indie as Rough Trade is an indie label. And I think the review is spot on. Yes it is a bit harsh but shit it is well written. Music reviewers so often do not focus on semantics and sentence structure. It is nice to find a reviewer that obviously cares about English. So no the review is not that accurate but congrats Lukas for your excellent writing

Posted by Al - anonymous 1 year ago

user image
what the fuck is indie music these days anyway, it's literally impossible to understand it's so hard to define what it is. The Morning Bender's aren't 'indie.'

Posted by J - anonymous 1 year ago

user image
I agree with J, this is a bit of a bogus review. The Morning Benders have just stepped up on production on this album. Not everyone may have a hunch on Pitchfork, but their reviews are spot on a majority of the time.

Posted by Steph - anonymous 1 year ago

user image
well perhaps if you actually listened to the album more than once, and have had any previous experience of the Morning Benders and Indie music in general perhaps you could take a more educated stance and provide an insightful comment. But please feel free to read Pitchfork and agree with everything they say. I think the review is well written and to the point. Big Echo was a very average album with far too much production.

Posted by John Lyndon - anonymous 1 year ago

user image
This is a really horrible negative centred review with too much opinion to boot. A review like the following is definitely more fitting for this album, giving a well deserved and fitting 8.2/10 -
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/13965-big-echo/

Posted by J - anonymous 1 year ago



your comments
Name:
Related
See more from The Morning Benders



Album Review Homepage
Go to reviews home
Reviews - Latest
ELSEWHERE twitter facebook Mobile - M.UTR.CO.NZ
Content copyright 2012 UnderTheRadar.co.nz | some rights reserved | report any web problems to here