Album Review



by The Phoenix Foundation

7 / 10
19th April 2010

Reviewed by Gareth Meade

Over the course of three albums The Phoenix Foundation have charmed, thrilled and delighted a growing legion of fans, myself included. With every eagerly anticipated release, my expectations have almost invariably been exceeded. I say ‘almost’ because last year the band released the Merry Kriskmass EP; a pleasant and unobtrusive effort that I hoped wasn’t a sign of things to come. While it was entirely listenable, it just wasn’t essential by The Phoenix Foundation’s standards. As it turns out, that EP’s style hasn’t been carried over to fourth album Buffalo; but unfortunately the aforementioned adjectives have.

Buffalo is an inconsistent album, suffering from a confused track order while also featuring some of the band’s least necessary material yet. It feels uncomfortable to describe The Phoenix Foundation as pleasant or meandering, but that is exactly how proceedings begin with Eventually. At five and a half minutes it doesn’t qualify as a quaint introduction to the album and nor does its melody deviate enough to deter you from wanting to move onto the next song.

First single and title track “Buffalo” is at least a jauntier effort, characterising the bands endless charm. It’s a reminder that The Phoenix Foundation are never ones to take themselves or their music too seriously. And yet it still seems half baked thanks to an interminable midsection. Almost as if they got halfway through and then couldn’t decide where to go from there.

The subsequent three tracks are more surefooted. Sounding like an outtake from Luke Buda’s solo album Vesuvius, “Flock of Hearts” has a simple melody that belies the songs intricacy. Meanwhile, “Pot “is the kind of musical flippancy that forces a smile onto your face as you sing along to every word. “Bitte Bitte” is more complex, but is similar in its cheerful dash. It may well be the closest this album gets to a “40 Years”, “Going Fishing” or “Damn the River”.

By now we’re only halfway through, but the best has come and gone. “Skeleton” and “Orange & Mango” just seem uncharacteristically unnecessary. Which is a bold statement when talking about a band that has Bruiser (Miami 4000) in their oeuvre, but at least that songs experimentation was interesting. “Bailey’s Beach” once again evokes words like ‘pleasant’, floating to the back of your consciousness rather than commanding your attention. Things get better on Wonton, which sees The Phoenix Foundation attempting to stretch themselves beyond their comfort zone. Finally, “Golden Ship” builds from gentle acoustic guitar into a fuzzed out crescendo, righting some of the wrongs of the tracks that wander aimlessly. It would serve as a great pre-encore finale at a live performance and is a strong finish to the album.

It was probably inevitable, after three exceptional albums, that The Phoenix Foundation would falter. And it’s only because of the strength of those releases that Buffalo could be described as anything less than stellar. There are flashes of brilliance here, just not the consistent brilliance we’re used to.

Total: 7
user image
I haven't heard the album yet but isn't 7/10 a fairly high rating for something that you mostly criticise?

Posted by 11903 6 years ago

user image
Exactly my thoughts...

Posted by - anonymous 6 years ago

user image
Posted by Word - anonymous 6 years ago

user image
Why is it that reviewers who don't necessarily like a new zealand band's album always seem generous with rating it? Dude you just basically called this album boring and gave it a 7!? New zealand bands aren't charities aye, you can and should tell it like it is. Either it deserved a better review or a lower rating, make your mind up.
Posted by - anonymous 6 years ago

user image
I personally love it! They have been putting up a new song off Buffalo on there website every day so far this week, that I have been keenly playing to see FOR MYSELF what they have come up with, before just gettin the album, or going off reviews.

I feel you can see the changes within the varying stages of the bands progression over the years with each album - none is like another. Something I personally like. This too goes for the quirkyness of the band and their happyness to explore and try different styles along the TPF theame.

Remember the reviewer is generally giving an expression influenced by their taste in music, and maybe this one does it less so for him than some of TPF's others. That would not however stop him from giving it a 7/10 rating as still thinking it's a good album just not particularly something he is amazed by. That is not an outragously high rating compared to his comments I feel, and claiming pitty due to it being a NZ band shows more about your own view than the reviewers!
Posted by Katnz - anonymous 6 years ago

user image
Have now listened to the album 5 times over...gets a solid 8.5 from me.Don't quite understand what Gareth Meade means by a confused track order...Eventually is a great opener, and the remainder of the tracks in their order,make sense...i guess it's just one person opinion eh?! As is mine.
Enjoy the album,it's a goody.
Posted by - anonymous 6 years ago

user image
Upon my first listen of this album I fell asleep (ok I'd had a long day but still).
Posted by Hershy - anonymous 6 years ago

your comments


Reviews - Latest